When our CEO Wendy Gonzalez took the stage at Super AI 2025, she delivered a stark message: The AI industry is facing a crisis that goes far beyond technical challenges. With 70% of AI deployments still failing and Gartner projecting $30 billion in spending to combat AI misinformation alone, the question is no longer whether we can afford to prioritize diversity in AI development. It has become a categorical imperative.
The headlines tell the story. Air Canada faced legal consequences when their chatbot provided incorrect bereavement fare information. Chevrolet dealerships found themselves embarrassed when AI chatbots made unauthorized promises. Google's AI Overview generated harmful responses that damaged user trust. These aren't isolated incidents, they're symptoms of a systemic problem.
The financial impact extends beyond individual company embarrassments. Organizations are grappling with misinformation amplified at scale, reputational damage in public-facing interactions, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and operational disruption from failed deployments that waste investment and require process rebuilding.
The industry's instinct has been to solve AI reliability through better algorithms and larger datasets. While technical improvements matter, they miss a fundamental truth: AI systems reflect the perspectives, biases, and blind spots of the people who build them.
Consider high-risk AI applications in financial services and safety-critical systems. A homogeneous development team might optimize for seemingly objective metrics that actually embed systemic biases. They might overlook edge cases affecting marginalized communities or fail to anticipate how AI performs across different cultural contexts.
Enterprise-grade AI demands clean, validated data, but it also demands diverse perspectives to recognize when that data might be incomplete, biased, or contextually inappropriate.
At Sama, we've learned that diversity isn't a nice-to-have addition. It's critical infrastructure that determines whether AI systems succeed or fail in the real world. Our leadership reflects this philosophy: 57% of our executive team identifies as female, and 29% are people of color.
This is about more than quotas, however. It's about building teams that spot problems others miss, ask questions others don't consider, and design solutions that work for everyone, not just a narrow user subset.
As Wendy emphasized, responsible AI requires examining every development chain link: fair labor practices for humans training AI systems, data governance that prevents harmful bias perpetuation, testing by teams reflecting end-user diversity, deployment monitoring across different communities, and user protection built in from the start.
Beyond bias mitigation, there's a broader innovation advantage. Diverse teams don't just catch more problems, they identify more opportunities. When your development team understands different markets, languages, and cultural contexts, you build AI solutions that work globally, spot new use cases, and create products resonating with diverse customer bases.
Wendy's key message borrowed from carpentry: "Measure twice, cut once."
In AI development, this means investing heavily in evaluation, testing, and monitoring frameworks before deploying at scale.
But here's the crucial insight: measurement is only as good as the people doing it. If your evaluation team lacks diversity, you're measuring twice with the same biases and blind spots.
Effective AI governance requires diverse evaluation teams, comprehensive testing for fairness and robustness across user groups, ongoing monitoring for drift and degradation, and transparent reporting that surfaces problems early.
The AI industry stands at a crossroads. We can continue building systems that work for some people some of the time, or commit to building AI that works for everyone, everywhere, reliably.
At Sama, we've seen how diverse teams create more robust, reliable, and innovative AI solutions. We've learned that building a sustainable and inclusive digital economy isn't just good ethics—it's good business.
The billion dollars being spent combating AI misinformation could have been invested in building better systems from the start. The future of AI isn't just about what we build, it's about who we empower to build it responsibly.
The choice is ours. The time is now.
Interested in Sama's approach to responsible AI development? Contact our team to explore how we can help build AI solutions that actually work.
Sama provides ML Professionals and AI team Leads with an indispensable solution for Computer Vision data labeling.
