3 Hidden Costs of Data Annotation

3 Hidden Costs of Data Annotation

Studies have shown that high-quality data annotations are crucial to improving machine learning model accuracy. However, selecting an annotation solution that meets your accuracy requirements, budget, and timeline can be a daunting task. There are often hidden costs that arise when trying to scale annotations, resulting in project delays or unexpected expenses.

In our latest webinar, Identifying the Hidden Costs of Data Annotation, Megan McNeil, Product Manager – 2D Image/Video, and Ryan Tavakolfar, Sr. Solutions Engineer, explore the key factors that can impact the efficiency and quality of data annotation and how they interplay with each other.

If you don’t have time to watch the entire webinar today, this blog post will jump ahead to the top three hidden costs and tips for calculating the total cost of ownership.

1. Cost of Quality

One of the biggest factors that can add up in cost is the need for rework due to excessive rejections. When annotations are rejected during the data annotation process, it can have significant repercussions on project timelines and costs. The process of revisiting and fixing rejected annotations not only causes project delays but also incurs increased expenses due to the extra resources and labor required.

Rejected annotations often necessitate coordination between annotators and project managers to identify and address the underlying issues, leading to interruptions in project planning or delivery management. Similarly, the absence of clear and consistent annotation guidelines can result in excess reviews and sampling, requiring more resources and prolonging the annotation process. This can result in a cascading effect on subsequent project tasks and deliverables, potentially impacting the overall project schedule and budget. It highlights the importance of maintaining clear communication, comprehensive annotation guidelines, and rigorous quality control measures to minimize rejections and mitigate the associated delays and costs.

Minimal or no annotator training can have unintended consequences including longer project ramp up or rework required on delivery. Without proper training, annotators may struggle to meet the desired quality standards, leading to inefficient workflows and the need for extensive supervision and feedback.

In the agriculture industry, for example, there are often subtle nuances and distinctions between various diseases and plants as well as large taxonomies that annotators need to understand. Annotators need significant training and clear guidelines in order to understand the difference between the types of diseases and plants that they are labeling.

2. Cost of Project Delays

Project delays in data annotation can have significant repercussions, impacting timelines, budgets, and overall project success. Even slight delays, such as an additional week, can impact the time to market and the ability to meet deadlines.

Operational inefficiencies are one of the most common causes of project delays. Long feedback loops and delays in giving annotators feedback can hinder the annotation process and slow down project progress. Communication and clarification between the client team and the annotation team that takes days or even weeks leads to excessive idle time where annotators are ready to work but lack the required information to proceed.

In data management, project timelines aren’t always sequential. There are often times when data collection is ongoing while the annotation project is already underway. This can lead to delays where not all the data is readily available, leaving the project team idle until the complete dataset is collected. It serves as a prime example of how an early delay in the process can have a ripple effect on downstream activities, causing subsequent delays and impacting overall project efficiency.

Every day counts in today’s competitive landscape, and even a small delay can result in missed opportunities, loss of competitive advantage, or failure to meet critical deadlines. The longer it takes to annotate and process data, the longer it takes to train models and deploy them in real-world applications, hindering innovation and impacting business growth.

3. Cost of Security

Data security is of utmost importance in data annotation due to the sensitive nature of the data involved. Organizations handle vast amounts of data, including personal information, proprietary data, and confidential business information. Ensuring the security and privacy of this data is crucial to maintain customer trust, comply with regulatory requirements, and mitigate the risk of data breaches or unauthorized access.

Annotators have access to this sensitive data, making it essential to have robust security measures in place. This includes implementing secure data transfer protocols, restricting access to authorized personnel only, and employing encryption techniques to protect data at rest and in transit.

Crowdsourcing annotations increases the risk of data breaches since crowd workers are external individuals who may not be subject to the same security protocols as in-house annotators. Ensuring the confidentiality of the data becomes challenging when it is shared with a large and diverse group of crowd workers, some of whom may have malicious intent or inadequate security measures in place.

Sama, on the other hand, is a vertically integrated partner meaning we have full control over the security of our offices and how our annotators interact with the data minimizing the risk of a data breach or leaked information.

The Total Cost of Ownership for Data Annotation Projects

Calculating the total cost of data annotations requires a comprehensive approach that considers both the obvious and hidden costs associated with the process. While the obvious costs, such as annotation fees and platform expenses, are relatively straightforward to identify, it is crucial to delve deeper and uncover the hidden costs, like rework and project delays, to understand the true financial impact.

Annotation costs can also vary significantly based on factors such as the complexity of the data, the annotation guidelines, and the volume of data to be annotated – especially when outsourcing the task to an external annotation service provider.

In the automotive industry, for example, the complexity of data varies significantly – ranging from a solitary car cruising down a serene country road to a bustling highway teeming with hundreds of vehicles caught in a chaotic traffic jam. Understanding the type of data plays a crucial role in calculating costs, especially with the increase in complexity when comparing images alone to a more intricate scenario involving fused Lidar and Video data.

Another aspect to consider is the platform cost which may include licensing fees, subscription plans, or usage-based pricing model. It’s important to consider any additional expenses for platform customization, integrations, and ongoing support and maintenance when calculating the total cost.

The Bottom Line

Not all annotation projects are the same. By addressing all cost drivers organizations can gain a more accurate understanding of the total cost of data annotations, enabling them to make informed decisions and optimize their annotation processes for efficiency and cost effectiveness.

Want to learn more? Watch our webinar.

Related Resources

New Ebook: How to Get Quality Ground Truth Labels for All Autonomous Driving Applications – Without Busting the Bank

13 Min Read

The State of Data Annotation in Computer Vision

13 Min Read
video annotators

In-House vs Outsourcing Data Annotation for ML: Pros & Cons

13 Min Read